Editorial standards

How Shotz approaches health-related content.

Product education should be clear, factual, and modest about its limits. These standards describe how Shotz handles product claims, health context, sources, review, and corrections.

Published August 11, 2026

01

Purpose and scope

Shotz content is written to explain the product and help people organize a medication routine. Product descriptions must reflect features that actually exist. Health-related context is included only when it is useful to that organizational purpose.

02

Medical information is not medical advice

Shotz does not publish diagnosis, treatment recommendations, dosing recommendations, or instructions for changing, delaying, skipping, or repeating a dose. Questions about a medication, symptoms, or an individual treatment plan belong with a qualified healthcare professional.

03

Sources

When a page makes a medical or health factual claim, the preferred sources are primary, authoritative materials such as official prescribing information, regulator publications, and original clinical guidance from responsible public-health or professional bodies. Sources must directly support the visible claim and are cited where readers can inspect them.

04

Publication and update dates

Published articles display a publication date. A substantive revision that changes the meaning, evidence, or practical usefulness of an article receives a visible updated date. Small spelling, formatting, or link fixes do not need a new update date.

05

AI assistance and human responsibility

AI tools may assist with research organization, drafting, or editing. AI output is not treated as a source. A human remains responsible for checking product claims, verifying any cited sources, applying these standards, and approving the final page for publication.

06

Corrections

Readers can request a correction by emailing simon@shotzapp.app with the page URL and a concise description of the issue. Confirmed errors are corrected promptly; substantive changes receive an updated date or correction note when that context helps the reader.

Current review status

Editorially reviewed, not medically reviewed.

Shotz does not currently identify a qualified medical reviewer for its website content. Pages must not carry a “medically reviewed” label unless a named, qualified reviewer has reviewed the complete material.

Corrections & questions

Tell us what needs attention.

Email simon@shotzapp.app with the page and the concern. Source suggestions are welcome, but every claim is checked before a change is published.